Institution record
FXGlobe
FXGLOBE
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFSCOffshore Vanuatu Financial Services Commission | 700227 | Regulated | FS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 2023-02-28 | |
FSATier-3 Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway | FT00080018 | Regulated | FXGLOBE LTD | 2013-12-16 | |
AMFTier-1 Autorité des marchés financiers | 55605 | Regulated | FXGlobe Ltd | 2013-12-16 | |
CYSECTier-2 Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | 205/13 | Regulated | FXGlobe Ltd | 2013-06-20 | |
CNBTier-2 Czech National Bank | Number pending check | Regulated | FXGlobe | 2013-12-16 | |
FITier-1 Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority | 33750 | Regulated | FXGlobe Ltd | 2013-12-16 | |
KNFTier-2 Polish Financial Supervision Authority | Number pending check | Regulated | FXGlobe Ltd | 2013-12-16 | |
BoLTier-2 Bank of Lithuania | Number pending check | Regulated | FXGlobe Ltd | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing FXGlobe against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXGlobe (this record) | VFSCFSAAMF+5 | 8 / 8 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Nordea | ECBFIDKFSA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| SEB | ECBFIN-FSAFI | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| National Bank of Vanuatu | RBVVFSC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Sberbank of Poland | ECBKNF | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Československá obchodní banka | CNB | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
FXGlobe: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is FXGlobe's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, FXGlobe (legal entity reference: FXGLOBE) holds 8 recorded licence entries, of which 8 carry a "regulated" status and 8 are marked regulated or registered: VFSC (Vanuatu Financial Services Commission) — licence 700227, status: regulated, Offshore; FSA (Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway) — licence FT00080018, status: regulated, Tier-3; AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers) — licence 55605, status: regulated, Tier-1; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 205/13, status: regulated, Tier-2; CNB (Czech National Bank) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; FI (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence 33750, status: regulated, Tier-1; KNF (Polish Financial Supervision Authority) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; BoL (Bank of Lithuania) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official VFSC, FSA, AMF public register.
Which of FXGlobe's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
FXGlobe is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 8 recorded licences (VFSC, FSA, AMF, CYSEC, CNB, FI, KNF, BoL) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is FXGlobe's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
FXGlobe carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to FXGlobe's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with FXGlobe, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to VFSC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to FXGlobe's supervisory scope.
Statutory Law & Custody Architecture
Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)
A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.
Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation
ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility
ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate & FICC Sponsored Repo: Done-With vs. Done-Away Clearing Mechanics
U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate refers to SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) requiring FICC central clearing for eligible Treasury cash trades by December 31, 2026 and repos by June 30, 2027.
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covered entities