Skip to content
FinLexicon WikiStructured Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Regulation & Market Microstructure

Institution record

GarantiFX

Garanti Yatirim Menkul Kiymetler AS

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
CMBTier-2
Capital Markets Board of Turkey
034RegulatedGaranti Yatirim2016-01-22

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing GarantiFX against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
GarantiFX (this record)
CMB
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
PRAOCCHKMA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Deutsche Bank AG
FRSECBPRA+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
American Express
FRSOCCFDIC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
BofA
FDICFRSOCC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Citibank, N.A.
OCCFDICFRS
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0

GarantiFX: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is GarantiFX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, GarantiFX (legal entity reference: Garanti Yatirim Menkul Kiymetler AS) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: CMB (Capital Markets Board of Turkey) — licence 034, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official CMB public register.

Which of GarantiFX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

GarantiFX is registered at Etiler Mahallesi Tepecik Yolu Demirkent Sok. No: 1 Beşiktaş 34337 İSTANBUL and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (Forex, Stocks, Futures) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (CMB) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is GarantiFX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

GarantiFX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to GarantiFX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with GarantiFX, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to CMB.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to GarantiFX's supervisory scope.

All research →

Statutory Law & Custody Architecture

Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)

A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.

Read briefing →

Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation

ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).

Read briefing →

Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy

U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate & FICC Sponsored Repo: Done-With vs. Done-Away Clearing Mechanics

U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate refers to SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) requiring FICC central clearing for eligible Treasury cash trades by December 31, 2026 and repos by June 30, 2027.

Read briefing →

Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covered entities

Read briefing →
GarantiFX — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki