Institution record
Gate.io
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCCTier-2 Dubai Multi Commodities Centre | Number pending check | Regulated | GATE MENA DMCC | — | |
GFSCTier-2 Gibraltar Financial Services Commission | 121003 | Regulated | Hippo Capital Co Limited | 2021-09-04 | |
MFSATier-2 Malta Financial Services Authority | C 89337 | Regulated | GATE TECHNOLOGY LTD | 2018-11-12 | |
OAMTier-3 Organismo Agenti e Mediatori | PSV83 | Regulated | Gate Italy S.R.L | 2022-12-22 | |
ASICTier-1 Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 659 401 617 | Regulated | GATE INFORMATION PTY LTD | 2022-05-13 | |
OAMTier-3 Organismo Agenti e Mediatori | Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT | Regulated | Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT | 2024-02-27 | |
CRTier-3 Companies Registry（Registrar of Companies, HKSAR） | TC008572 | Regulated | Hippo Financial Services Limited | — | |
SECRTier-3 State Enterprise Centre of Registers | 306068986 | Regulated | Gate Global UAB | 2022-05-12 | |
SCBOffshore Securities Commission of The Bahamas | Number pending check | Regulated | GATE GLOBAL LIMITED | 2025-02-28 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Gate.io against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gate.io (this record) | DMCCGFSCMFSA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Westpac | APRARBNZASIC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Macquarie Bank | APRAASICASIC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | APRAASIC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Westpac BANK | APRAASIC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAOCCHKMA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Gate.io: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Gate.io's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Gate.io (legal entity reference: Gate.io) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-2; GFSC (Gibraltar Financial Services Commission) — licence 121003, status: regulated, Tier-2; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) — licence C 89337, status: regulated, Tier-2; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence PSV83, status: regulated, Tier-3; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 659 401 617, status: regulated, Tier-1; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence Gate Technology Italia SRL,Gate.MT, status: regulated, Tier-3; CR (Companies Registry（Registrar of Companies, HKSAR）) — licence TC008572, status: regulated, Tier-3; SECR (State Enterprise Centre of Registers) — licence 306068986, status: regulated, Tier-3; SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DMCC, GFSC, MFSA public register.
Which of Gate.io's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Gate.io is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (DMCC, GFSC, MFSA, OAM, ASIC, CR, SECR, SCB) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Gate.io's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Gate.io carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Gate.io's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Gate.io (listed execution software: Gate.io:Trade BTC & ETH), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (gate.it) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DMCC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Gate.io's supervisory scope.
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: CCAR / DFAST Supervisory Stress Test & Pillar 3 Disclosure Rules (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing stress capital buffer (SCB) interactio
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: CCAR / DFAST Supervisory Stress Test & Pillar 3 Disclosure Rules ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing stress capital buffer (SCB)
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
Basel III 72.5% Standardized Risk-Weighted Asset (RWA) Output Floor: CCAR / DFAST Supervisory Stress Test & Pillar 3 Disclosure Rules (72.5% Minimum RWA Floor Benchmark)
Basel III 72.5% Standardized Risk-Weighted Asset (RWA) Output Floor (BCBS-OUTPUT-FLOOR) stands at 72.5% (Minimum RWA Floor) (Source: Basel Committee (BCBS d424), 2026-10-20), governing stress capital buffer (SCB) interac
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) & Level 1 HQLA Buffer Standard: CCAR / DFAST Supervisory Stress Test & Pillar 3 Disclosure Rules (100% 30-Day Stress Minimum Benchmark)
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) & Level 1 HQLA Buffer Standard (LCR-HQLA-RATIO) stands at 100% (30-Day Stress Minimum) (Source: BIS Basel Committee, 2026-10-20), governing stress capital buffer (SCB) interactions and quar