Institution record
Mita Securities
Mita Securities Co.,Ltd.
- Source score
- 6.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSA Financial Services Agency | 6010001058171 | Regulated | MITA SECURITIES Co., Ltd | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Mita Securities against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mita Securities (this record) | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. OCC)Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA)Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed)+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Mizuho Securities | MASEuropean Central Bank (ECB Banking Supervision / SSM)Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA)+4 | 6 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
| 18shinwabank | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Akita Bank | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Bank of Nagoya | FSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
Mita Securities: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Mita Securities's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Mita Securities (legal entity reference: Mita Securities Co.,Ltd.) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Agency) — licence 6010001058171, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA public register.
Which of Mita Securities's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Mita Securities is registered at 3-11, Nihombashi-kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (Wealth management, Investment, Loans, Banking) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Mita Securities's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Mita Securities carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 6.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 6.0, market influence: 6.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Mita Securities's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Mita Securities, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (mitasec.com/en) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Mita Securities's supervisory scope.
Reference
A wire reading is not a settlement: Friday’s 5% yields, defined
On Friday two different “about 5%” yields were in the news: the US 10-year just under 5%, and the French 10-year just over 5% at the cash close. They are not the same object, and an afternoon headline is not a settlement.
Derivatives Regulation & Market Microstructure Encyclopedia
Leveraged ETP Microstructure & Statutory Derivatives Limits: SEC Cboe BZX 3x Crypto ETP Clearances, Rule 18f-4 VaR Compliance, and Constant-Leverage Decay Physics (2026)
An encyclopedic legal and quantitative reference dissecting the October 2026 SEC Cboe BZX 3x leveraged Bitcoin and Ether ETP clearances alongside the Senate Clarity Act stalemate, contrasting 1940 Act Rule 18f-4 Value-at-Risk (VaR) limits against 1933 Act commodity pool wrappers, 16:00 ET rebalancing gamma, and continuous-time volatility variance drag.
Statutory Law & Custody Architecture
Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)
A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.
Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation
ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility
ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).