Institution record
OKX
- Source score
- β
- Warnings
- 1
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAOffshore Financial Services Authority Seychelles | Number pending check | Regulated | Aux Cayes Fintech Co Ltd | β | |
MASTier-1 Monetary Authority of Singapore | Number pending check | Regulated | OKX SG PTE. LTD. | β | |
VARATier-2 Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority | VL/23/12/003 | Regulated | OKX Middle East Fintech FZE | 2024/09/17 | |
SECTier-3 Securities and Exchange Commission | Number pending check | Regulated | Okcoin Philippines Technology Co. Ltd. | β | |
SECTier-1 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | 1767779 | Regulated | OKCoin USA Inc | 2018-12-05 | |
AUSTRACTier-1 Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre | 22636269040 | Regulated | OKX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD | 2019-11-04 | |
AMFTier-1 AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers | E2023-106 | Regulated | OKX France Technology company Limited | 2023-12-12 | |
MFSATier-2 Malta Financial Services Authority | C95813 | Regulated | OKX EUROPE MARKETS LIMITED | 2020-11-06 | |
FinCENTier-1 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) | 31000293015755 | Regulated | OKX Global Digital Exchange Ltd | 2025-02-17 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing OKX against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKX (this record) | FSAMASVARA+6 | 9 / 9 | Risk level not supplied | β | 1 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAOCCHKMA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| RBC | MASOSFI | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| OCBC | MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| UOB | MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
| Natixis | AMFOSFI | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | β | 0 |
OKX: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is OKX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, OKX (legal entity reference: OKX) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority) β licence VL/23/12/003, status: regulated, Tier-2; SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) β licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-3; SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) β licence 1767779, status: regulated, Tier-1; AUSTRAC (Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) β licence 22636269040, status: regulated, Tier-1; AMF (AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers) β licence E2023-106, status: regulated, Tier-1; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) β licence C95813, status: regulated, Tier-2; FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) β licence 31000293015755, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA, MAS, VARA public register.
Which of OKX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
OKX is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (FSA, MAS, VARA, SEC, AUSTRAC, AMF, MFSA, FinCEN) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is OKX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
OKX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 1 regulatory warning or complaint count. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to OKX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with OKX (listed execution software: OKX), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 1 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to OKX's supervisory scope.
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covere
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Clearinghouse Default Waterfall & Margin Segregation Rules (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing omnibus versus legally segre
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) & Loss Multiplier Rules (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing Internal Loss Multiplier (IL