Skip to content
FinLexicon WikiStructured Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Regulation & Market Microstructure

Institution record

OKX

Risk level not supplied9 of 9 licences marked regulated
Source score
β€”
Warnings
1
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FSAOffshore
Financial Services Authority Seychelles
Number pending checkRegulatedAux Cayes Fintech Co Ltdβ€”
MASTier-1
Monetary Authority of Singapore
Number pending checkRegulatedOKX SG PTE. LTD.β€”
VARATier-2
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority
VL/23/12/003RegulatedOKX Middle East Fintech FZE2024/09/17
SECTier-3
Securities and Exchange Commission
Number pending checkRegulatedOkcoin Philippines Technology Co. Ltd.β€”
SECTier-1
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
1767779RegulatedOKCoin USA Inc2018-12-05
AUSTRACTier-1
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre
22636269040RegulatedOKX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD2019-11-04
AMFTier-1
AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers
E2023-106RegulatedOKX France Technology company Limited2023-12-12
MFSATier-2
Malta Financial Services Authority
C95813RegulatedOKX EUROPE MARKETS LIMITED2020-11-06
FinCENTier-1
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
31000293015755RegulatedOKX Global Digital Exchange Ltd2025-02-17

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing OKX against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory β†’
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
OKX (this record)
FSAMASVARA+6
9 / 9Risk level not suppliedβ€”1
MUFG Bank
PRAOCCHKMA+4
7 / 7Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
RBC
MASOSFI
2 / 2Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
OCBC
MAS
1 / 1Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
UOB
MAS
1 / 1Risk level not suppliedβ€”0
Natixis
AMFOSFI
2 / 2Risk level not suppliedβ€”0

OKX: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is OKX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, OKX (legal entity reference: OKX) holds 9 recorded licence entries, of which 9 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: FSA (Financial Services Authority Seychelles) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Offshore; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority) β€” licence VL/23/12/003, status: regulated, Tier-2; SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) β€” licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-3; SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) β€” licence 1767779, status: regulated, Tier-1; AUSTRAC (Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) β€” licence 22636269040, status: regulated, Tier-1; AMF (AutoritΓ© des marchΓ©s financiers) β€” licence E2023-106, status: regulated, Tier-1; MFSA (Malta Financial Services Authority) β€” licence C95813, status: regulated, Tier-2; FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) β€” licence 31000293015755, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSA, MAS, VARA public register.

Which of OKX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

OKX is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 9 recorded licences (FSA, MAS, VARA, SEC, AUSTRAC, AMF, MFSA, FinCEN) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is OKX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

OKX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 1 regulatory warning or complaint count. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to OKX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with OKX (listed execution software: OKX), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 1 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSA.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to OKX's supervisory scope.

All research β†’

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,

Read briefing β†’

Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covere

Read briefing β†’

Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Clearinghouse Default Waterfall & Margin Segregation Rules (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing omnibus versus legally segre

Read briefing β†’

Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) & Loss Multiplier Rules (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing Internal Loss Multiplier (IL

Read briefing β†’
OKX β€” Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki