Skip to content
FinLexicon WikiStructured Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Regulation & Market Microstructure

Institution record

SHAKEPAY

SHAKEPAY INC

Risk level not supplied0 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
FINTRACTier-1
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
M17065696ExpiredSHAKEPAY INC2017-02-24

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing SHAKEPAY against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
SHAKEPAY (this record)
FINTRAC
0 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
PRAOCCHKMA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Deutsche Bank AG
FRSECBPRA+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0
American Express
FRSOCCFDIC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
BofA
FDICFRSOCC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
Citibank, N.A.
OCCFDICFRS
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0

SHAKEPAY: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is SHAKEPAY's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, SHAKEPAY (legal entity reference: SHAKEPAY INC) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 0 carry a "regulated" status and 0 are marked regulated or registered: FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)) — licence M17065696, status: expired, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FINTRAC public register.

Which of SHAKEPAY's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

SHAKEPAY is registered at 1800-500 PLACE D'ARMES MONTREAL, QC, CANADA H2Y2W2 and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FINTRAC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is SHAKEPAY's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

SHAKEPAY carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to SHAKEPAY's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with SHAKEPAY, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FINTRAC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to SHAKEPAY's supervisory scope.

All research →

Statutory Law & Custody Architecture

Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)

A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.

Read briefing →

Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation

ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility

ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).

Read briefing →

Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy

U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate & FICC Sponsored Repo: Done-With vs. Done-Away Clearing Mechanics

U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate refers to SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) requiring FICC central clearing for eligible Treasury cash trades by December 31, 2026 and repos by June 30, 2027.

Read briefing →

Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covered entities

Read briefing →
SHAKEPAY — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki