Institution record
StoneX
StoneX Financial Inc.
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECTier-1 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 | |
MASTier-1 Monetary Authority of Singapore | Number pending check | Regulated | StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. | 2011 | |
ASICTier-1 Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 345646 | Regulated | City Index Australia Pty Ltd | 2014 | |
FCATier-1 Financial Conduct Authority | 446717 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Ltd | 2010 | |
NFATier-2 National Futures Association | 0501390 | Regulated | StoneX Financial Inc. | 2015 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing StoneX against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StoneX (this record) | SECMASASIC+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAOCCHKMA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Westpac | APRARBNZASIC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Macquarie Bank | APRAASICASIC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Al Rayan Bank | PRAFCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | APRAASIC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
StoneX: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is StoneX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, StoneX (legal entity reference: StoneX Financial Inc.) holds 5 recorded licence entries, of which 5 carry a "regulated" status and 5 are marked regulated or registered: SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence CRD 136795 / SEC 8-68179, status: regulated, Tier-1; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 345646, status: regulated, Tier-1; FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) — licence 446717, status: regulated, Tier-1; NFA (National Futures Association) — licence 0501390, status: regulated, Tier-2. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEC, MAS, ASIC public register.
Which of StoneX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
StoneX is registered at 230 S LaSalle St #10-500 Chicago, IL 60604 and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 5 recorded licences (SEC, MAS, ASIC, FCA, NFA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is StoneX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
StoneX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to StoneX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with StoneX, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (stonex.co) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to StoneX's supervisory scope.
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,
Statutory Law & Custody Architecture
Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)
A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes, ISDA proto
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covere