Institution record
Texas
Texas Security Bank
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDICTier-1 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (U.S.) | 58393 | Regulated | Texas Security Bank | 2008 | |
TDBTier-1 Texas Department of Banking | Number pending check | Regulated | Texas Security Bank | 2008 | |
FRSTier-1 U.S. Federal Reserve System | 3642638 | Regulated | Texas Security Bankshares, Inc. | 2008 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Texas against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas (this record) | FDICTDBFRS | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAOCCHKMA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Deutsche Bank AG | FRSECBPRA+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| American Express | FRSOCCFDIC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| BofA | FDICFRSOCC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Citibank, N.A. | OCCFDICFRS | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Texas: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Texas's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Texas (legal entity reference: Texas Security Bank) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (U.S.)) — licence 58393, status: regulated, Tier-1; TDB (Texas Department of Banking) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1; FRS (U.S. Federal Reserve System) — licence 3642638, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FDIC, TDB, FRS public register.
Which of Texas's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Texas is registered at 1212 Turtle Creek Blvd, Dallas, Texas 75207, United States and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 3 recorded licences (FDIC, TDB, FRS) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Texas's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Texas carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Texas's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Texas, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (texassecuritybank.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FDIC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Texas's supervisory scope.
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covered entities
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Balance-Sheet Netting Mechanics & RWA Capital Weight Calculation (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing multilateral netting compression and T
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison: US vs. EU CRR III vs. UK PRA (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing national divergences, gold-plating rem
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Clearinghouse Default Waterfall & Margin Segregation Rules (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing omnibus versus legally segregated oper