Skip to content
FinLexicon WikiStructured Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Regulation & Market Microstructure

Institution record

CES

CES Forex (HK) Limited

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
SFCTier-1
Securities and Futures Commission
ACI995RegulatedCES Forex (HK) Limited2005-03-04

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing CES against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
CES (this record)
SFC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
HSBC
HKMASFC
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Fortune
SFC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
HSBC
SFC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
PRAOCCHKMA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Deutsche Bank AG
FRSECBPRA+1
4 / 4Risk level not supplied—0

CES: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is CES's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, CES (legal entity reference: CES Forex (HK) Limited) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence ACI995, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SFC public register.

Which of CES's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

CES is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (CFDs, Precious metals, Stock indices, Forex) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SFC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is CES's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

CES carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to CES's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with CES, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (ebshk.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SFC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to CES's supervisory scope.

All research →

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison: US vs. EU CRR III vs. UK PRA (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing national divergences, gold-plating rem

Read briefing →

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access, CCLF fee p

Read briefing →

ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison: US vs. EU CRR III vs. UK PRA (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing national divergences, gold-p

Read briefing →

ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access,

Read briefing →
CES — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki