Institution record
HashKey Exchange
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing HashKey Exchange against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HashKey Exchange (this record) | SFCMAS | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | PRAOCCHKMA+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| HSBC | HKMASFC | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| RBC | MASOSFI | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| OCBC | MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| UOB | MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
HashKey Exchange: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is HashKey Exchange's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, HashKey Exchange (legal entity reference: HashKey Exchange) holds 2 recorded licence entries, of which 2 carry a "regulated" status and 2 are marked regulated or registered: SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence BOP237, status: regulated, Tier-1; MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SFC, MAS public register.
Which of HashKey Exchange's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
HashKey Exchange is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 2 recorded licences (SFC, MAS) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is HashKey Exchange's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
HashKey Exchange carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to HashKey Exchange's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with HashKey Exchange, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (hashkey.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SFC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to HashKey Exchange's supervisory scope.
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes, ISDA proto
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
U.S. G-SIB Surcharge Method 2 Systemic Capital Buffer: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (-40 bps 2026 Surcharge Cut Benchmark)
U.S. G-SIB Surcharge Method 2 Systemic Capital Buffer (GSIB-METHOD2) stands at -40 bps (2026 Surcharge Cut) (Source: Federal Reserve Board, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes, ISDA protocol adherence, and