Institution record
IIFL
IIFL Securities
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India | INZ000164132 | Regulated | IIFL SECURITIES LIMITED | 2005-05-17 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing IIFL against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIFL (this record) | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Anand Rathi | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| Marwadi | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| SBI Securities | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Trustline | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| HDFC Bank | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
IIFL: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is IIFL's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, IIFL (legal entity reference: IIFL Securities) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) — licence INZ000164132, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEBI public register.
Which of IIFL's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
IIFL is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Loans) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SEBI) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is IIFL's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
IIFL carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 6.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to IIFL's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with IIFL (listed execution software: IIFL : Stocks, Demat & IPOs), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEBI.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to IIFL's supervisory scope.
Reference
A wire reading is not a settlement: Friday’s 5% yields, defined
On Friday two different “about 5%” yields were in the news: the US 10-year just under 5%, and the French 10-year just over 5% at the cash close. They are not the same object, and an afternoon headline is not a settlement.
Derivatives Regulation & Market Microstructure Encyclopedia
Leveraged ETP Microstructure & Statutory Derivatives Limits: SEC Cboe BZX 3x Crypto ETP Clearances, Rule 18f-4 VaR Compliance, and Constant-Leverage Decay Physics (2026)
An encyclopedic legal and quantitative reference dissecting the October 2026 SEC Cboe BZX 3x leveraged Bitcoin and Ether ETP clearances alongside the Senate Clarity Act stalemate, contrasting 1940 Act Rule 18f-4 Value-at-Risk (VaR) limits against 1933 Act commodity pool wrappers, 16:00 ET rebalancing gamma, and continuous-time volatility variance drag.
Statutory Law & Custody Architecture
Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)
A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.
Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation
ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility
ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).