Institution record
Trustline
Trustline Securities Ltd
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India | INZ000211534 | Regulated | TRUSTLINE SECURITIES LIMITED | 1995-07-26 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Trustline against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trustline (this record) | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Anand Rathi | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 7.0 | 0 |
| IIFL | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Marwadi | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| SBI Securities | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| HDFC Bank | SEBI | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
Trustline: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Trustline's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Trustline (legal entity reference: Trustline Securities Ltd) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) — licence INZ000211534, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEBI public register.
Which of Trustline's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Trustline is registered at Trustline Tower, B-3, Sector-3, IN,Uttar Pradesh,Noida,201301 and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (Stocks, Commodities, Bonds, Funds, Wealth management, Investment, Loans, Insurance) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SEBI) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Trustline's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Trustline carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Trustline's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Trustline, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEBI.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Trustline's supervisory scope.
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access, CCLF fee p
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access,
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access,
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
U.S. G-SIB Surcharge Method 2 Systemic Capital Buffer: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (-40 bps 2026 Surcharge Cut Benchmark)
U.S. G-SIB Surcharge Method 2 Systemic Capital Buffer (GSIB-METHOD2) stands at -40 bps (2026 Surcharge Cut) (Source: Federal Reserve Board, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access, CCLF fee pass-throughs, and m