Skip to content
FinLexicon WikiStructured Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Regulation & Market Microstructure

Institution record

The Capital Group

Risk level not supplied3 of 3 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
MASTier-1
Monetary Authority of Singapore
249688RegulatedCAPITAL GROUP INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.—
FCATier-1
Financial Conduct Authority
943758RegulatedCapital Group UK Management Company Limited2022-01-07
SFCTier-1
Securities and Futures Commission
Number pending checkRegulatedCapital International Inc.2004-12-03

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing The Capital Group against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
The Capital Group (this record)
MASFCASFC
3 / 3Risk level not supplied—0
MUFG Bank
PRAOCCHKMA+4
7 / 7Risk level not supplied—0
Al Rayan Bank
PRAFCA
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
HSBC
HKMASFC
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
Lloyds Bank
PRAFCA
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0
RBC
MASOSFI
2 / 2Risk level not supplied—0

The Capital Group: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is The Capital Group's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, The Capital Group (legal entity reference: The Capital Group) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence 249688, status: regulated, Tier-1; FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) — licence 943758, status: regulated, Tier-1; SFC (Securities and Futures Commission) — licence Number pending check, status: regulated, Tier-1. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MAS, FCA, SFC public register.

Which of The Capital Group's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

The Capital Group is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Futures) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 3 recorded licences (MAS, FCA, SFC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is The Capital Group's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

The Capital Group carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to The Capital Group's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with The Capital Group, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MAS.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to The Capital Group's supervisory scope.

All research →

Statutory Law & Custody Architecture

Statutory Client Asset Segregation & Insolvency Waterfalls: Comparative Legal Architecture of FCA CASS 7, SEC Rule 15c3-3, SIPA, and EU MiFID II Custody Regimes (2026)

A definitive statutory and insolvency-law reference comparing UK FCA CASS 7 statutory trusts, US SEC Rule 15c3-3 customer reserve formulas and SIPA liquidations, EU MiFID II Article 16(8)-(10) title-transfer prohibitions, and Japanese FIEA Article 43-2 trust bank mandates.

Read briefing →

Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes, ISDA proto

Read briefing →

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,

Read briefing →

ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon

FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)

FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,

Read briefing →
The Capital Group — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki