1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CIMB vs MX Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CIMB (Commerce International Merchant Bank) and MX Global (MX Global) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Banks and deposit-taking institutions
CIMB and MX Global are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, CIMB holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MX Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CIMB | MX Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | CIMB |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CIMB vs MX Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CIMB | MX Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Commerce International Merchant Bank | MX Global |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BNM: Not supplied | SC: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 17th Floor Menara CIMB, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Kuala Lumpur Sentral 50470 Kuala Lumpur. | Level 7, Tower N, Jalan Damansara, Empire City, PJU 8, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Malay, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CIMB and MX Global against other regulated peers in our banks and deposit-taking institutions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CIMB vs MX Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CIMB or MX Global?
Both CIMB and MX Global hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CIMB maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (BNM) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MX Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CIMB and MX Global?
In FinLexicon Wiki's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CIMB records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MX Global at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CIMB and MX Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CIMB lists Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MX Global lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CIMB or MX Global?
CIMB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MX Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.