Institution record
HTX
- Source score
- 6.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing HTX against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTX (this record) | MASVARAAUSTRAC | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
MASPrudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA)Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. OCC)+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
MASHong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
MASOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. OCC) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 | |
MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
MAS | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
HTX: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is HTX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, HTX (legal entity reference: HTX) holds 3 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 3 are marked regulated or registered: MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; VARA (Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; AUSTRAC (Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official MAS, VARA, AUSTRAC public register.
Which of HTX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
HTX is tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Derivatives contracts, Trading, Spot trading) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 3 recorded licences (MAS, VARA, AUSTRAC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is HTX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
HTX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 6.0, risk & licensing: 6.0, brand: 6.0, market influence: 6.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to HTX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with HTX, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to MAS.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to HTX's supervisory scope.
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
SEC Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3a Customer Clearing Margin Segregation: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Segregated Reserve Lock Benchmark)
SEC Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3a Customer Clearing Margin Segregation (RULE-15C3-3A) stands at 100% (Segregated Reserve Lock) (Source: U.S. SEC Division of Trading and Markets, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Anne
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes, ISDA proto
Central Clearing & Repo Architecture
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)
SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,
ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: Master Agreement Clauses, Legal Opinions & Novation Workflows ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)
FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing SIFMA Cleared Repo Annexes,