Skip to content
FinLexicon Wiki
Directory

Institution record

Yes

Yes Securities

Risk level not supplied1 of 1 licences marked regulated
Source score
5.0
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
Securities and Exchange Board of India
INZ000185632RegulatedYES SECURITIES (INDIA) LIMITED2013-07-08

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Yes against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Yes (this record)
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied5.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied4.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied4.00
SEBI
1 / 1Risk level not supplied3.00

Yes: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Yes's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Yes (legal entity reference: Yes Securities) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) — licence INZ000185632, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEBI public register.

Which of Yes's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Yes is registered at 2nd Floor, North Side, YES BANK House, Off Western Express Highway, Santacruz East, Mumbai - 400055. Maharashtra, India. and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (Forex, Stocks, Funds) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SEBI) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Yes's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Yes carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Yes's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Yes, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEBI.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Yes's supervisory scope.

All research →

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)

Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access, CCLF fee p

Read briefing →

ISDA & Counterparty Credit Lexicon

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (100% Eligible Repo Scope Benchmark)

SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate (SEC-UST-CLEARING) stands at 100% (Eligible Repo Scope) (Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access,

Read briefing →

Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards

FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers ($1.95T Daily Sponsored Volume Benchmark)

FICC Sponsored Member Repo (SMR) Done-With & Done-Away Clearing (FICC-SPONSORED-REPO) stands at $1.95T (Daily Sponsored Volume) (Source: DTCC Fixed Income Clearing Corp, 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access,

Read briefing →

Central Clearing & Repo Architecture

Basel III 72.5% Standardized Risk-Weighted Asset (RWA) Output Floor: Buy-Side Institutional Impact: Hedge Funds, MMFs & Asset Managers (72.5% Minimum RWA Floor Benchmark)

Basel III 72.5% Standardized Risk-Weighted Asset (RWA) Output Floor (BCBS-OUTPUT-FLOOR) stands at 72.5% (Minimum RWA Floor) (Source: Basel Committee (BCBS d424), 2026-10-20), governing done-away execution access, CCLF fe

Read briefing →
Yes — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | FinLexicon Wiki