1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
MUTB BANK vs Permata Bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MUTB BANK (Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation) and Permata Bank (Permata Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Banks and deposit-taking institutions
MUTB BANK and Permata Bank are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, MUTB BANK holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Permata Bank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | MUTB BANK | Permata Bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: MUTB BANK vs Permata Bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | MUTB BANK | Permata Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation | Permata Bank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | No. 4-5, Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan | World Trade Center II, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 29 - 31, Jakarta 12920, Indonesia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Financial services, Asset management, Banking | Financial services, Banking |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English, Japanese | Indonesian, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare MUTB BANK and Permata Bank against other regulated peers in our banks and deposit-taking institutions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: MUTB BANK vs Permata Bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MUTB BANK or Permata Bank?
Both MUTB BANK and Permata Bank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MUTB BANK maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Permata Bank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (OJK) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MUTB BANK and Permata Bank?
In FinLexicon Wiki's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MUTB BANK records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Permata Bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do MUTB BANK and Permata Bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
MUTB BANK lists Financial services, Asset management, Banking with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Permata Bank lists Financial services, Banking with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MUTB BANK or Permata Bank?
MUTB BANK carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Permata Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.