1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Gate.io vs Macquarie Bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Gate.io (Gate.io) and Macquarie Bank (Macquarie Group Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Banks and deposit-taking institutions
Gate.io outranks Macquarie Bank by +0.8 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.8 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Gate.io holds 9 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 9 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Macquarie Bank holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Gate.io | Macquarie Bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.8 | 5.0 | +0.8 | Gate.io |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.8 | 5.0 | +0.8 | Gate.io |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.8 | 5.0 | +0.8 | Gate.io |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.8 | 5.0 | +0.8 | Gate.io |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Gate.io vs Macquarie Bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Gate.io | Macquarie Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Gate.io | Macquarie Group Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 9 regulated / 9 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | KY | Australia Sydney |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Financial services, Asset management, Banking, Investment |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Gate.io:Trade BTC & ETH | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, German, Simplified Chinese, French, and more than 20 widely used international languages in total | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Gate.io and Macquarie Bank against other regulated peers in our banks and deposit-taking institutions slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gate.io vs Macquarie Bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Gate.io or Macquarie Bank?
Gate.io holds more active regulated filings (9 vs 3). Specifically, Gate.io maintains 9 total recorded filing(s) (DMCC, , MFSA, SECR) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Macquarie Bank maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), ASIC, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Gate.io and Macquarie Bank?
In FinLexicon Wiki's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Gate.io records an Overall Score of 5.8 (Risk & Licensing: 5.8, Brand: 5.8, Market Influence: 5.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Macquarie Bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Gate.io and Macquarie Bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Gate.io lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [Gate.io:Trade BTC & ETH], while Macquarie Bank lists Financial services, Asset management, Banking, Investment with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Gate.io or Macquarie Bank?
Gate.io carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Macquarie Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.