Pôle Thématique · 20 Notes Publiées
Liquidity Coverage Nsfr Prudential research topics and source records from FinLexicon Wiki. Basel III prudential banking liquidity standards pair the 30-day 100% Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Level 1/2A/2B HQLA haircuts with the 1-year Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and BCBS 248 intraday buffers.
Basel III prudential banking liquidity standards pair the 30-day 100% Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Level 1/2A/2B HQLA haircuts with the 1-year Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and BCBS 248 intraday buffers.
Under Basel LCR30, High-Quality Liquid Assets apply 0% Level 1, 15% Level 2A, and 25%–50% Level 2B haircuts while enforcing 40% and 15% composition caps both before and after 30-day repo unwinds.
Basel LCR40 assigns 30-day stressed outflow run-off rates stepping from 3%–5% on insured transactional retail deposits to 25% on operational clearing balances, 40% corporate, and 100% financial deposits.
Basel LCR40 caps aggregate 30-day contractual cash inflows at 75% of total stressed outflows while haircut-rolling 50% of maturing retail and corporate loans, enforcing a hard 25% HQLA floor.
Under Basel LCR40.56, derivatives dealers pre-fund stressed variation margin volatility using the 24-month Historical Look-Back Approach (HLBA) alongside 3-notch rating-downgrade CSA triggers.
Basel LCR40 sharply distinguishes general-purpose corporate credit revolvers (10% drawdown) from debt-backstop liquidity facilities (30% corporate, 40% bank, and 100% ABCP/SPV drawdown).
Basel NSF30 assigns 1-year Available Stable Funding (ASF) weights stepping down from 100% on regulatory capital and >=1-year liabilities to 95%/90% on retail deposits, 50% on <1Y corporate, and 0% on <6M financial funding.
Basel NSF30 calibrates 1-year Required Stable Funding (RSF) weights from 0%–5% on unencumbered Level 1 HQLA and 10%/15% on financial reverse repos up to 65% on prime mortgages, 85% corporate loans, and 100% on encumbered or NPL assets.
Basel NSF30 imposes doubly asymmetric funding charges on OTC derivatives: disallowing bond VM offsets on derivative assets, assigning 0% ASF to net liabilities, and charging a 5%–20% RSF add-on on gross derivative liabilities.
Published in BCBS 248, Basel intraday liquidity monitoring tracks minute-by-minute RTGS cumulative peak net debit usage, time-specific CLS and CCP payment deadlines, and intraday payment throughput.
Under Basel SRP31 (BCBS d368), prudential banking supervisors evaluate Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book across six yield-curve shocks, flagging outliers whenever Economic Value of Equity depletion exceeds 15% of Tier 1 capital.
Contractually withdrawable at par overnight yet behaviorally sticky across rate cycles, Non-Maturity Deposits (NMDs) are governed under Basel SRP31 by strict core proportion ceilings (50%–90%) and average maturity caps of 4 to 5 years.
U.S. Regulation WW (12 CFR Part 249) gold-plates international Basel LCR via the 12 CFR 249.30 Peak-Day Maturity Mismatch Add-On while scaling LCR/NSFR stringency from 100% down to 85%, 70%, or 0% across Tailoring Categories I–IV.
Beyond standardized Pillar 1 LCR/NSFR formulas, ECB/PRA ILAAP and U.S. Regulation YY (12 CFR 252.35) mandate bespoke Internal Liquidity Stress Testing across overnight, 30-day, and 90-to-365-day survival horizons.
Holding sovereign HQLA prevents runs only if bonds convert into central bank reserves within minutes; compare the Fed Standing Repo Facility (SRF), Discount Window, ECB Marginal Lending, and Bank of England STR/ILTR.
Amortized-cost Held-to-Maturity (HTM) accounting shields reported CET1 from bond rate losses only while funding remains sticky; in LCR, HQLA is always marked to fair market value, exposing fragile uninsured deposit franchises.
Consolidated home-currency LCR ratios can mask acute USD funding shortfalls; examine Basel LCR30.45 significant-currency LCR, off-balance-sheet FX swap rollover cliffs, and CLS PvP settlement.
Basel NSF30.35–NSF30.37 grants national discretion to assign 0% ASF and 0% RSF to strictly matched pass-through items where a liability cannot fall due while the linked asset remains on balance sheet.
Borrowing Level 1 sovereign bonds against equities or corporate debt in a collateral swap boosts HQLA only when remaining maturity exceeds 30 days; sub-30-day upgrades vanish completely under the LCR30.36 unwind rule.
Under BCBS 144 Sound Liquidity Principles, banks unite ex-ante Liquidity Funds Transfer Pricing (LFTP) internal tax curves with ex-post Contingent Funding Plan (CFP) playbooks triggered by real-time Early Warning Indicators.
Yes! Basel LCR20.5 explicitly states that during periods of acute idiosyncratic or systemic financial stress, banks are expected to monetize their HQLA stockpile and allow reported LCR to dip temporarily below 100% under supervisory oversight rather than hoarding liquidity via fire sales.
LCR assumes standard 3%–10% retail and 25%–40% corporate 30-day run-off rates; if concentrated uninsured venture-capital or tech corporate depositors withdraw 25%–85% of total deposits in 24–48 hours while long-dated bonds sit locked in unpledged HTM accounts, actual outflows overwhelm statutory LCR weights.
Any bond pledged as collateral for more than 30 days (or securing a term loan) is encumbered and completely excluded from LCR HQLA; in NSFR, assets encumbered for 6 to 12 months receive at least a 50% RSF charge, and >=12 months receive a 100% RSF charge.
Under the 2019 U.S. Tailoring Rules (12 CFR Part 249), banking organizations below $100 billion (and Category IV banks between $100B and $250B with <$50B in weighted short-term wholesale funding) were exempted from formal Reg WW LCR and NSFR, relying instead on Reg YY Internal Liquidity Stress Tests.
A 35-day repo matures *outside* the 30-day LCR stress window: cash raised stays in Level 1 with 0% outflow in the next 30 days, and LCR30.32 only unwinds secured funding maturing *within* 30 calendar days, unlocking trapped excess Level 2A capacity.
Under LCR30.39, required reserves count in Level 1 HQLA ONLY to the extent the central bank’s operational framework explicitly permits those reserve balances to be drawn down during periods of idiosyncratic liquidity stress.